National Security Threat Assessment Dilemma

Back in my day, the National Security Council, Defense Intelligence Agency, Central Intelligence Agency, and the Joint Staff War Planners, to name the major players, developed the National Threat Assessment on a regular basis. This document defined what national security threats the USA were likely to face in the years to come. This assessment identifies who and what kind of threats our military needs to be capable defending and defeating should a conflict arise. The assessment also calls for the nation's armed forces to be able to manage multiple conflicts worldwide at the same time. Example: War in Europe with Russia and South Korea defense against North Korea. An attack on Israel by Iran and China invading Taiwan. There are way too many possibilities, almost all of which would be difficult to deal with for US military even with allied support and forward based ships and forces.
Today we are in the 16th year of a Neverending War in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, and Yemen. We have a ticking time bomb in North Korea. Ukraine is simmering and a great place for Putin to challenge NATO (USA and EU). Putin also has his sights set on taking Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania back and get back on the Baltic Sea.
China may push the issue on nationalizing wide swaths of the South China Sea or trying to occupy Taiwan.
These possibilities and many, many others are all considered in the formulation of the National Threat Assessment. In years past, our military was expected to handle two major conflicts in two different regions of the world and still be able to defend the homeland. Today our armed forces are no longer manned and equipped to do two conflicts. In fact, we have stretched and worn out our existing forces and equipment maintaining a sustained war fighting effort in the Middle East. Tremendous money and personnel are being spent in sustaining our various special operations forces throughout the region. Special Operations forces are key elements in fighting IS and alQaeda throughout the region.
The money spent over these over 16 years in training, equipping, deploying, maintaining, overhauling and repairing, fueling, feeding, transporting, and rearming. The trained and experienced people and equipment are always critical but no less so than having enough munitions. In conflict, nothing disappears faster than ammo, missiles, rockets, etc.
Below is the US Navy force levels for the period 1938, beginning of WW2, up to end of 1944. Look at how many new ships were built is such a short time, manned with trained crews, armed and equipped to go directly to war.  This was just the building our Navy. The Army and Army Air Force grew explosively at the same time. It was a national effort of astonishing scale and sacrifice by only 133 million Americans. Imagine, of that 133 million men, women and children, 12 million were in uniform.
Could we do it again?
Navy Active Ship Force Levels, 1938-1944


DATE6/30/386/30/396/30/4012/7/4112/31/4212/31/4312/31/44
BATTLESHIPS15151517192123
CARRIERS, FLEET556741925
CARRIERS, ESCORT---1123565
CRUISERS32363737394861
DESTROYERS112127185171224332367
FRIGATES-----234376
SUBMARINES545864112133172230
MINE WARFARE272936135323551614
PATROL34201910051510501183
AMPHIBIOUS----1216732147
AUXILIARY101104116210392564993
SURFACE WARSHIPS159178237225282635827
TOTAL ACTIVE380394478790178236996084

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Growing Up a Navy Junior. 1947-1965

Keeping Busy As A Substitute Teacher

Blue and Gold Officer Summer Training - July 2010